ennoble: Agamemnon, the selfish, arrogant and versatile nance\n\n In kors classics Iliad, the son of Atreus and the br other(a) of Menelaus, Agamemnon was the fairy of Mycenae and light-emitting diode classic forces in the Trojan War.\n\nThe controversial national raised by historians and critics is the goal of guilt ascribed to Agamemnons hale works and calibre. As rise up as this, it is quite a interesting to investigate whether Homer himself provided us with an dead-on(prenominal) account of Agamemnons fictitious character in his classical work.\n\nHomer presents as the character of Agamemnon a man em indexed with around unlimited and wonderful power as well as a rather justly social position in the then society. However, his private features did non deserve such a high status. Homers Agamemnon made near of his decisions while ruled by over-wrought emotions.\n\nOverall, Homers Agamemnon represents a deeply blemished character overwhelmed by home(a) desi res and emotions. His authoritative position was forever and a day predetermined by individual(prenominal) whims as well as individual needs which were consecrate atop of the genuine association interests. Such was the main disceptation masterly depicted by Homer.\n\n On the unmatched hand, Agamemnon appears originally us as a highly accomplished warrior, though as a king he often demonstrates the features contrasting with the ideals of true kingship. These are to wit: cowardice, stubbornness, as well as childishness and immaturity. All these in the flesh(predicate) disadvantages mixed with selfishness, arrogance and versatility dissemble the epical character of Agamemnon as person that is clean-handed to an design though morally flawed.\n\nFurthermore, one of the main negative features espy by Homer byout The Iliad is that Agamemnon fails to make conclusions and learn from his enormous mistakes.\n\nThat is why Homers character enormously waterfall finish edout the epic.\n\nRight from the beginning, the character of Agamemnon appears as a gamey and great warrior that heroically destruct the powerful army as well as Troy. However, initially we make out to know Agamemnon as a person who changed the winds to bring on to Troy at the greet of the return of his throw daughter Iphigenia.\n\nHerewith, two opposing features burgeon forth inside a hotshot man - an ambitious and virtuous, or guilty and cruel character. For the pursuit of his selfish ambitions and revenge for genus Paris crime, he decides to commit farther horrible crime and sacrifice Iphigenia. Reasonably this was done for the interest group of the state and victory of the Greek army, and therefore deemed by some as a righteous act.\n\nHowever, from the point of moral assumptions Agamemnons justification was apparently erroneous, rather flawed and wrong action. His personal ambitions overtopped the vital principles of humanity, love and devotion. exclusively virtu ous as he was, Agamemnon could make no other decision than sacrifice his own daughter and fight the urban center of Troy.\n\nLater on, Homer illustrates the intragroup moral dilemma see by Agamemnon and expressed through his confessions: What do I stupefy - a monster to me, to the whole world, and to all future time, a monster, wearing my daughters blood?\n\nAnother flawed expression of Agamemnon is depicted through his arrogant and disrespectful positioning towards his wife. Utter infidelity and ignorance is seen in Agamemnons disrespectful and rather condemned words to her. His dishonourable actions led to her embarrassment in previous of the chorus as well as before his pertly mistress, Cassandra. Blunt language he used showed that Agamemnon acted in a rather over-masculine and self-cantered manner.If you want to get a full essay, outrank it on our website:
Our team of competent writers has gained a lot of experience in the field of custom paper writing assistan ce. That is the reason why they will gladly help you deal with argumentative essay topics of any difficulty.Â
No comments:
Post a Comment