The disposition of the United States, or Bill of Rights, was developed to sustain individuals by enforcing certain laws end-to-end the land and is bound under(a) the federal government and all(prenominal)(prenominal) state. The recompenses of individuals expand out to businesses, employees, and consumers. This affair depart discuss two specific inbuilt rights that may impact the employees of Huffman Trucking. Huffman Trucking will be doing an analysis of the hunt and seizure, cover, and employee do drugs test policies indoors the organization and determine if the constitutional rights of his or her employees are cosmos violated. If Huffman Trucking is in usurpation of the constitutional rights of their employees, the company flock and will be held criminally liable. Search and SeizureThe Federal force Carrier Safety judgeship (FMCSA) has been interested in the ? swank card? technology in order to be employ for Hours of Service (HOS) compliance of push motortruck drivers. All drivers would each have an electronic onboard registrar (EOBR) relate to a world-wide positioning satellite (GPS) system. The EOBR would be installed on most trucks for the employment of monitoring and enforcing compliance HOS regulations. This is sought after by the FMCSA because this system would tailor down or remove the falsifying of HOS. Furthermore, this data would be available for anyone who enforces HOS regulations such as the owner, carrier, or law enforcement incumbent (OOIDA, 2006). The real-time electronic control system, proposed by the government commission FMSCA, is close to the area of irrupt on the Huffman driver?s right of privacy. The Fourth Amendment grants persons the right to be ?secure in our persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures, and no warrants shall issue, precisely upon seeming cause, supported by Oath or affirmation, and in particular describing the institutionalize to be searched, and the persons or things to be...

This move is based on a fundamental flaw. The penning does not guarantee privacy on anything approaching the domain that the writer suggests. Specifically, there is no constitutional protection against surveillance of something that is in study view, and a truck on the bridle-path is considered to be (duh) in plain view. part drug testing may be obnoxious, and is imperfect, it is not unconstitutional. This essay needs to be reworked entirely. As to drug testing, if a hugger-mugger employer wants to do drug testing, the courts have consistently held that this is not a governmental program, so that it is not illegal and the Constitution has no bearing on the issue. If you want to get a proficient essay, order it on our website:
OrderessayIf you want to get a full information about our service, visit our page: How it works.
No comments:
Post a Comment